Connect with us


Why Big Oil and Biden can’t agree on oil prices amid Russia crisis



Permian Basin rigs in 2020, when U.S. crude oil production dropped by 3 million a day as Wall Street pressure forced cuts.

Paul Ratje | Afp | Getty Images

When Devon Energy announced fourth-quarter earnings on Feb. 15, the world looked like its newly comfortable, fiscally conservative oyster.

After losing nearly 90% of its value from 2014 through October 2020, the Oklahoma City-based oil and gas producer was the top-performing 2021 stock in the Standard & Poor’s 500, thanks to a concerted strategy of throttling back on exploration, squeezing costs and taking less risk. It turned a 2020 loss of $2.5 billion into a $2.8 billion profit for 2021, raising its dividend 45% and plowing nearly $600 million into stock buybacks after spending just $38 million the year before, with promises of more cash to rain on once-beleaguered shareholders soon.

“Devon generat[ed] the highest level of cash flow in our prestigious 50-year history,” CEO Rick Muncrief crowed on a conference call. “We delivered exactly what our shareholder-friendly business model was designed for, and that is to lead the industry in cash returns.” 

Nine days later, Russia invaded Ukraine.

Now Devon and other producers face demands that the U.S. and Europe cut Russia off from world energy markets – not easy, since Russia’s 10 million barrels a day make it the world’s No. 3 producer of oil, and its natural gas supplies much of Western Europe’s heat and electricity. Even though a new Quinnipiac poll says 71% of Americans favor expanding sanctions on Russia to include its oil and gas industry, U.S. oil isn’t dying to pick up the slack – including Devon. 

There’s little wonder why oil isn’t eager to ride to Ukraine’s rescue: The exploration industry as a whole had nearly $20 billion in negative free cash flow as recently as 2015, losing $78 billion between 2005 and 2017 as hydraulic fracking took over the industry and drove crude prices lower amid oversupplied markets and overextended drillers. Free cash flow is a financial measure that accounts for the amount oil companies invest in new wells, which is deducted from accounting profits over the expected life of the wells.

Big Oil’s rebound and reluctance to drill

Devon’s turnaround was one of the more dramatic. In 2021, it reinvested only 32% of its operating cash flow in new wells, retired $1.2 billion in debt, raised its dividend, and bought back nearly $600 million of its stock just in the fourth quarter. This year, it planned for more of the same: Another $1 billion in debt reduction and $1.6 billion in stock buybacks,  a company worth $32 billion before war broke out, with only a third of cash flow being reinvested in more drilling.

The next day, Goldman Sachs analyst Neil Mehta’s bullish report on Devon didn’t mention Ukraine. No analyst had asked about it on Devon’s conference call to discuss quarterly results.

But as they said in The Godfather, just when Big Oil thought it was out, people want to pull it back in. And Devon CEO Rick Muncrief, for one, isn’t rushing to produce more, at least not without more explicit instructions from the White House.

“When you start thinking about investment decisions, upping capital budgets, trying to grow more, you really have to think about inflationary pressures and also think it will be about a year when you start to really see that production come in,” Muncrief told CNBC’s Jim Cramer last week. “So most publicly traded companies such as ourselves will be very thoughtful, very cautious about this. We’ve some head fakes, we understand the concerns about commodity prices right now, but we need to be somewhat patient and disciplined and stay focused.”

Days before that, though, he told Bloomberg that he was “mystified” that President Biden has not reached out to discuss raising oil production, as that might allow energy companies to make the case to shareholders more easily.

On Wednesday, in a speech to oil and gas executives at CERAWeek by S&P Global, the energy industry’s main annual conference, Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm called on the industry to produce more.

“We are on a war footing,” Granholm said. “We are in an emergency, and we have to responsibly increase short-term supply where we can right now to stabilize the market and minimize harm to American families,” she said, though she also indicated that further releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve are not off the table.

“I hope your investors are saying these words to you as well: In this moment of crisis, we need more supply… right now, we need oil and gas production to rise to meet current demand,” Granholm added.

On Wednesday afternoon, a Devon spokeswoman said nothing had changed in its position since the comments Muncrief provided to Cramer, but she stressed that the situation is fluid.

Replacing Russia’s 10 million barrels

Replacing the 10 million barrels a day of crude oil that Russia produces, according to the International Energy Agency, would take both time and money. President Biden’s announcement Monday that the U.S. would ban Russian imports was the easy part: The U.S. imported only 90,000-100,000 barrels a day from Russia, according to recent data, a tiny fraction of the 18 million barrels a day Americans consume. Replacing the four million Russian barrels that go to Europe daily – as well as Europe-bound natural gas – is much harder.

The industry quietly hopes to stay on the sidelines, as politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren rage, and even as crude reaches $125 a barrel on world markets, analysts say. And investors plan to hold their feet to the fire, according to Rob Thummel, portfolio manager at Tortoise Capital, a heavy investor in energy stocks. The new financial arrangements in the oil industry suit Wall Street after it lost money on energy for years, with the S&P 500 Energy Index, dropping 75% from 2014 to early 2020, he said.

“The sector went through the last decade growing production like crazy, and energy was the worst performing set of stocks in the S&P 500,” said Thummel. “So people questioned the business model. It sparked a shift to a ‘prove-it’ model. The investor wants cash flow, wants to see debt paid, see a dividend and stock buybacks.'” 

If U.S. oil is largely hamstrung financially, where would the oil likely come from to fill the gaps in the 95 million barrel per day world oil market resulting from lost Russian production or sanctions?

Analysts at Goldman Sachs argue that expanded U.S. production would be no more than the fourth biggest source of new barrels to meet a cutoff of Russia.

The first place replacement barrels would come from is OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which works with Russia but has not formally admitted it as a member. Goldman says the core OPEC nations of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait could add 2.1 million million barrels per day of production within “a few months.” 

Prospects for that are hampered, however, by reports that leaders of Saudi Arabia and the UAE have recently declined to accept phone calls from President Biden, while talking to Putin.

“While such an outcome becomes increasingly likely the more Russia is excluded from the global economy, driving core-OPEC, Iran and the West closer together to increase supply, it would nonetheless likely take weeks to reach and a month for supply to start increasing,” analysts led by Damien Courvallin and Jeffrey Currie wrote. 

On Wednesday, crude oil shed 12% as there were signs of more willingness from OPEC nations including the UAE to increase supply.

The next two sources would be pariah nations, Iran and Venezuela, that get a pass for past transgressions against the U.S. and the West because their oil is needed now, Goldman’s analysts wrote on March 7.  

The U.S. has been trying since Biden took office to get Iran back into compliance with its 2015 nuclear disarmament deal so sanctions imposed by the Trump administration in 2019 can be lifted. Venezuela was sanctioned by former Presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama over suppression of protests, cooperating with terror groups fighting to overturn Colombia’s government, alleged drug smuggling and other transgressions.

But Goldman is cautious about the potential for more production from those two nations. It believes Venezuela would only be able to add about 500,000 barrels per day if sanctions were lifted, and that production in Iran wouldn’t rebound until at least summer, not reaching 1 million barrels a day until the fall. 

Inflation is an issue for oil companies, too

That leaves the U.S., where oil production fell by more than 3 million barrels a day between 2019 and early 2021, according to government data, and have bounced about halfway back. The reason for the drop was the sharp pullback in drilling activity by Devon and others: The number of oil rigs working dropped to 250 in mid-2020 from 1,077 in late 2018, according to industry data compiled by Baker Hughes.

The logistical hurdles to boosting production quickly are severe, said Matt Portillo, research director at Tudor, Pickering and Holt, a boutique energy bank. These include labor shortages that would be hard to fix, as workers laid off during production cuts have found other jobs. And supply chain challenges, which affect everything from steel tubing to the specialized sand used in hydraulic fracking. ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance said in a CNBC interview that oil production’s supply chain is seeing double-digit inflation for key inputs like sand.

“We’re in a really dire situation,” said Vicki Hollub, CEO of Oxy, on Tuesday at CERAWeek by S&P Global. “We’ve never faced a scenario where we need to grow production, when actually supply chains not only in our industry but every industry in the world [are] being impacted by the pandemic. … Now, with supply chain challenges, it makes any kind of attempt to grow now — and at a rapid pace — very, very difficult,” she said.

This is on top of the fact that Hollub says investors view capital discipline as “essentially no growth.”

Portillo thinks U.S. shale production will rise by about 650,000 barrels per day this year, with most of the gains coming from smaller producers whose shares are not publicly traded and can afford to ignore investor pressure. Integrated oil companies like Exxon Mobil have announced small production hikes, but the midsized exploration companies that account for most drilling are trying hard to resist, he said. 

“In 2022, there’s little chance you’ll see a difference in capital commitments, Portillo said. “And there are physical constraints that limit expansion in the short term.”

There’s not much the Biden administration can do to speed new production, said Peter McNally, vice president and global energy sector lead at Third Bridge. Options like expanding drilling leases on federal lands, as some politicians have urged, wouldn’t deliver new barrels fast enough because of the time needed to build wells and prepare to drill – a point echoed by Pioneer Natural Resources CEO Scott Sheffield, who said on CNBC that nearly all U.S. oil comes from privately owned land anyway. 

“That won’t help in the next 12 months,” McNally said. “That’s more like three years.”

That means the outlook is for little relief for consumers at U.S. gas pumps, who have seen average prices jump 50 cents to $4.10 per gallon of regular fuel in the last week, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

And at the top of the list of causes is an industry, and investor base, not convinced that even today’s prices will last long enough to generate a durable, reliable return on investors’ money.

“We have a contract with our shareholders to pay back 80% of our free cash flow back to the investors,” Sheffield said. “So we have to get shareholder support.” 

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Teladoc Tumbled 38% After Big First-Quarter Loss. Is It Just a Pandemic Play?



Text size

Source link

Continue Reading


After pandemic drop, Canada’s detention of immigrants rises again By Reuters



© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Two closed Canadian border checkpoints are seen after it was announced that the border would close to “non-essential traffic” to combat the spread of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at the U.S.-Canada border crossing at the Thousand Isla

By Anna Mehler Paperny

TORONTO (Reuters) – Canada is locking up more people in immigration detention without charge after the numbers fell during the pandemic, government data obtained by Reuters shows.

Authorities cite an overall rise in foreign travelers amid easing restrictions but lawyers say their detained clients came to Canada years ago.

Canada held 206 people in immigration detention as of March 1, 2022 – a 28% increase compared with March 1 of the previous year. Immigration detainees have not been charged with crimes in Canada and 68% of detainees as of March 1 were locked up because Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) fears they are “unlikely to appear” at an immigration hearing, according to the data.

The rise puts Canada at odds with Amnesty International and other human rights groups that have urged Ottawa to end its use of indefinite immigration detention, noting CBSA has used factors such as a person’s mental illness as reason to detain them.

A CBSA spokesperson told Reuters that “when the number of entries (to Canada) goes up, an increase in detention is to be expected.” CBSA has said in the past it uses detention as a last resort.

A lawyer told Reuters her detained clients have been in Canada for years.

In the United Kingdom, too, immigration detention levels rose last year after dropping earlier in the pandemic, according to government statistics. Unlike Canada, the United States and Australia, European Union member states have limits on immigration detention and those limits cannot exceed six months.

The rise in detentions puts people at risk of contracting COVID-19 in harsh congregate settings, refugee lawyers say.

Julia Sande, Human Rights Law and Policy Campaigner with Amnesty, called the increase in detentions “disappointing but not surprising,” although she was reluctant to draw conclusions from limited data.

The number of immigration detainees in Canada dropped early in the pandemic, from a daily average of 301 in the fourth quarter (January through March) of 2019-20 to 126 in the first quarter (April through June) of 2020-21.


Detaining fewer people did not result in a significant increase in no-shows at immigration hearings – the most common reason for detention, according to Immigration and Refugee Board data.

The average number of no-shows as a percentage of admissibility hearings was about 5.5% in 2021, according to that data, compared to about 5.9% in 2019.

No-shows rose as high as 16% in October 2020, but a spokesperson for the Immigration and Refugee Board said this was due to people not receiving notifications when their hearings resumed after a pause in the pandemic.

Refugee lawyer Andrew Brouwer said the decline in detention earlier in the pandemic shows Canada does not need to lock up as many non-citizens.

“We didn’t see a bunch of no-shows. We didn’t see the sky fall … It for sure shows that the system can operate without throwing people in jail,” Brouwer said.

He added that detainees face harsh pandemic conditions in provincial jails – including extended lockdowns, sometimes with three people in a cell for 23 hours a day.

Refugee lawyer Swathi Sekhar said CBSA officials and the Immigration and Refugee Board members reviewing detentions took the risk of COVID-19 into account when deciding whether someone should be detained earlier in the pandemic but are doing so less now.

“Their position is that COVID is not a factor that should weigh in favor of release,” she said.

“We also see very, very perverse findings … [decision-makers] outright saying that individuals are going to be safer in jail.”

The Immigration and Refugee Board did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Source link

Continue Reading


Nasdaq futures rise as market attempts comeback from April sell-off, Meta shares soar



Stock futures rose in overnight trading as the market shook off the April sell-off and investors reacted positively to earnings from Meta Platforms.

Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 70 points or 0.2%. S&P 500 futures gained 0.7% and Nasdaq 100 futures jumped 1.2%.

The moves came as shares of Meta surged more than 18% after hours following a beat on earnings but a miss on revenue, a sign that investors may see signs of relief in the beaten-up tech sector. Shares were down 48% on the year heading into the results.

Meanwhile, shares of Qualcomm gained 5.6% in extended trading on the back of strong earnings while PayPal rose 5% despite issuing weak guidance for the second quarter.

“I think a lot of people want to believe that earnings are going to pull us out of this, but earnings are not what got us into this,” SoFi’s Liz Young told CNBC’s “Closing Bell: Overtime” on Wednesday. “… But the reality is there are so many macro headwinds still in front of us in the next 60 days that the market is just hard to impress.”

The after-hour activity followed a volatile regular trading session that saw the Nasdaq Composite stoop to its lowest level in 2022, as stocks looked to bounce back from a tech-led April sell-off. The index is down more than 12% since the start of April.

In Wednesday’s regular trading, the tech-heavy Nasdaq ended at 12,488.93, after rising to 1.7% at session highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 61.75 points, or 0.2%, to 33,301.93 propped up by gains from Visa and Microsoft, while the S&P 500 added 0.2% to 4,183.96.

Investors await big tech earnings on Thursday from Apple, Amazon and Twitter, along with results from Robinhood. Jobless claims are also due out Thursday.

Source link

Continue Reading