Good evening. She might have lost a crucial Supreme Court ruling on Scottish independence, but Nicola Sturgeon has another plan. At the World Cup, Germany took part in an incendiary on-pitch protest. But, first, the headlines…
The big story: Japan’s surprise victory over Germany
It was the moment they gave their opponents a taste of their own medicine. Japan’s Bundesliga players took matters into their own hands in their 2-1 comeback win over Germany in Group E of the World Cup today.
In the days before the match, the Japanese had waxed lyrical over the contribution of Germany and its coaches for helping to develop the game in the country in the decades after the Second World War.
But when they left the pitch at Doha’s Khalifa stadium as sensational winners, they had clearly outsmarted their teachers. Read our match report.
Germany, in common with six other European teams, had insisted on wearing “OneLove” rainbow armbands as a statement condemning the Gulf state’s draconian laws against homosexuality, but backed down after threats from Fifa.
Meanwhile, England are optimistic that captain Harry Kane has not suffered any damage to his ankle after the striker underwent a scan and took part in training.
Manager Gareth Southgate must still decide whether or not to start Kane against the United States on Friday. But the news on his injury was treated as encouraging inside the England camp following a heavy challenge in the team’s victory over Iran on Monday.
Grealish surprises young fan
When he saw Jack Grealish doing his “worm” celebration at the World Cup, he described it as “a dream come true”.
So when the England midfielder surprised schoolboy Finlay Fisher with a video call from Qatar, it took his elation to another level. Grealish had dedicated his goal celebration on Monday to the 11-year-old, who has cerebral palsy.
The pair met during a Manchester City community event in November and Grealish promised him he would do their special dance move when he scored his next goal. Watch the touching moment they spoke in the video below.
The Inflation Reduction Act gives the IRS an additional $80 billion to hire 87,000 more agents with the hope of bringing in about $200 billion in additional tax revenues over the next 10 years. But in 2021 alone, the federal government spent $279 billion of taxpayers’ money on improper payments.
This glaring double standard—cracking down on taxpayers who have to navigate a 7,000-page tax code as the federal government fails miserably at making the proper payments in the programs it designs and administers itself—shouldn’t exist.
At a cost of more than $2,000 per household, Americans are paying more for bureaucrats to send faulty payments—to the wrong people or in the wrong amounts—than they are for some of the core functions of the federal government.
Improper payment rates across most of the federal government’s 78 reported programs are high enough to put any private sector company out of business. But a handful of large programs account for the vast majority of improper payments.
Nine programs accounted for 94%, or $262 billion, of improper payments in 2021. Health insurance programs and child-related tax credits have the highest rates of improper payments: More than 1 in 5 Medicaid dollars, more than 1 in 4 earned income tax credit dollars, and more than 1 in 3 children’s health insurance program dollars were improper payments. [Note that in the below, Medicare incorporates three Medicare programs: fee-for-service, Medicare Advantage, and prescription drugs.]
The program with the worst track record in 2021 was the Department of Veterans Affairs’ long-term services and supports, which properly paid only 27%, or $708 million, out of $2.6 billion in total payments.
Improper payments mean taxpayers pay more and beneficiaries receive less. Had those VA payments been properly paid, up to four times as many veterans could have received services, or taxpayers could have saved billions of dollars.
Moreover, the $279 billion in improper payments for 2021 is an understatement. It doesn’t include improper payments in some of the most problematic programs, such as Obamacare subsidies and the disastrous Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.
The 2021 improper payments figure includes only $78 billion in improper unemployment insurance benefits, but my own analysis found that $357 billion in pandemic unemployment insurance benefits (which were in effect from March 2020 to September 2022) went to people who were not unemployed.
Pandemic unemployment insurance programs will likely go down as the biggest fraud in U.S. history. Unfortunately, only a tiny fraction of the criminals who stole taxpayers’ money will be prosecuted.
While the pandemic unemployment insurance programs were temporary, improper payments in the federal government are both long-standing and rising.
First, no one ever spends other people’s money more carefully than they spend their own, and the same is true of the federal bureaucracy spending taxpayers’ money. And, second, the federal government has expanded so far beyond its original purpose—now spending four times as much transferring money from some people to others as it does on national defense and the justice system combined—that efficiency and accountability have fallen by the wayside.
Between 2005 and 2021, gross domestic product increased 79%, federal program payments rose 228%, and improper payments skyrocketed 522%.
Despite an array of legislation and regulatory directives that seek to hold federal programs accountable, improper payments continue to run rampant. For example, a former assistant director of forensic audits and investigative service at the Government Accountability Office, Linda Miller, explained in congressional testimony this year that federal programs are supposed to check the federal Do Not Pay database before issuing payments, but they ping the database and then issue the payments before receiving the results from the database.
And the sheer growth in federal spending and transfer payments—as opposed to core functions of government—has made it all the more difficult to protect the integrity of taxpayers’ dollars. In 2021, 4 of every 5 tax dollars the federal government collected, and 1 of every 2 dollars it spent, went to transfer payments.
Virtually all the $3.3 trillion in federal payments sent out in 2021—at a cost of $25,000 per household in America—were for things outside the traditional functions of the federal government.
The basic tenets of those recommendations, which include using part of the $80 billion in IRS funding to create a new Taxpayer Integrity Office within the Treasury, boil down to:
Determining whether individuals filing for benefits are who they claim to be.
Verifying that they are eligible for the benefits they claim.
Imposing accountability on program administrators who fail to follow required system checks and who exceed improper payment limitations.
Limiting the number of government programs Americans need to interact with in their everyday lives.
By applying better verification metrics, imposing accountability on program administrators, and limiting the number of government programs that Americans need to interact with, policymakers can limit what they need to take in taxes so that more Americans can decide—without bureaucratic approval—what they want to spend their money on and when they want to spend it.
Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.
But the local taxpayers might be left picking up a much more expensive electricity bill than in previous years as soaring prices and the inability to turn the lights off will hike costs up.
Other towns have cut their displays this year altogether in the cost of living crisis – and some locals are furious at their own “blinking Blackpool illuminations.”
One local said on social media: “Who foots the bill, especially with the extortionate prices currently being charged by our beloved energy suppliers?”
Another appeared to criticise the decision, writing simply, “This is a joke.”
‘It’s too late to change this year’
Suzanne Wilson, recently appointed town clerk said: “Unfortunately when the lights were fitted in 2021, they weren’t fitted with a timer which means they have to be on 24/7.
“We’ve spoken with the lights company and they would need to put a timer on every single lamppost, so that would mean fitting 63 individual timers which would obviously take time and come at a cost.
“We’re in a five year contract with the company so it is something we will be looking at for next year as it’s too late to change this year.”
Addressing locals’ concerns about energy costs, Ms Wilson said: “Ideally, we would have them on a timer and I wish they were on a timer to save on energy costs but unfortunately we can’t change that at the moment. The tree is on a timer but unfortunately the lampposts aren’t.
“We know that energy costs are going up everywhere, we have seen that in our buildings and it’s affecting everybody. We try to do whatever possible to save money where we can and we will be looking into finding a solution for next year.”