Connect with us


Sunday shows preview: Omicron surge continues; anniversary of Jan. 6 attack approaches



The United States’ record-setting number of COVID-19 cases amid the spread of the omicron variant and the anniversary of the violent Jan. 6 insurrection nearing next week are expected to dominate this week’s Sunday show circuit.

The U.S. is experiencing a new surge of COVID-19 cases, with numbers rapidly outpacing figures from last winter. On Wednesday, the country reached a record number of COVID-19 cases, reporting over 486,000 new infections, according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The day prior, the U.S. saw over 439,000. 

Last January, the country saw cases as high as over 294,000, per CDC data.

Initial research and data are starting to paint a picture of what the omicron variant may look like, with early indications that it is not quite as severe as health officials once feared.

study released last month conducted by U.S. and Japanese researchers, suggested that less severe impacts on the lungs, throat and nose were caused by omicron. That study is still under review and was conducted on hamsters and mice.

President BidenJoe Biden Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report Biden to speak to Ukraine’s president Documents show Chinese government collects droves of data from Western social media: report MORE’s chief medical adviser Anthony FauciAnthony FauciMichigan shifts, will follow CDC isolation guidance 2021’s top political celebrity moments These 3 issues will clobber Democrats in 2022   MORE also pointed to hospital data and international research suggesting that omicron was less severe among people who are vaccinated than the delta variant.

“We know now, incontrovertibly, that this is a highly, highly transmissible virus. We know that from the numbers we’re seeing,” Fauci said during a White House briefing earlier this week, adding “all indications point to a lesser severity of omicron versus delta.”

While those signs are encouraging, the CDC has faced some criticism for amending its guidelines regarding isolation periods. On Monday, the CDC said that as long as individuals who had COVID-19 were asymptomatic, they could shorten their isolation period from 10 days to five days.

The CDC suggested that following isolation people should wear masks regardless of vaccination status when in contact with others for the next five days.

“The reason is that now that we have such an overwhelming volume of cases coming in, many of which are without symptoms, there’s the danger that this is going to have a really negative impact on our ability to really get society to function properly,” Fauci said in defense of the new guidelines in an interview on NewsNation’s “Morning in America” on Thursday.

Fauci is scheduled to appear on ABC’s “This Week” and CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday.

Meanwhile, next Thursday will mark the one-year anniversary of a mob of supporters of former President TrumpDonald Trump Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report The year in weird: 9 bizarre political stories that rocked 2021 Michigan shifts, will follow CDC isolation guidance MORE ransacking the Capitol and attempting to stop Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential elections. 

Lawmakers, aides and reporters hid in offices, closets and a secure, undisclosed location in the Capitol as Trump supporters breached the building on Jan. 6. Over 700 people have since been charged in connection with the violent series of events, and a House select committee was established to investigate the events surrounding the riot.

That violent day has not only exacerbated partisan divisions between Democrats and Republicans, but has also driven a wedge between a smaller handful of Republicans who have broken ranks with the party in their response to the riot, notably including Reps. Liz CheneyElizabeth (Liz) Lynn CheneyThe 10 biggest news stories of the year Alaska GOP governor accepts Trump endorsement, Murkowski ultimatum Pelosi announces series of events to mark Jan. 6 anniversary MORE (R-Wy.) and Adam KinzingerAdam Daniel KinzingerAlaska GOP governor accepts Trump endorsement, Murkowski ultimatum Pelosi announces series of events to mark Jan. 6 anniversary Ukraine president, US lawmakers huddle amid tensions with Russia MORE (R-Ill.), and their GOP colleagues.

Cheney and Kingzinger both sit on the House select committee investigating Jan. 6, much to the disapproval of some of their GOP colleagues. They are the only two Republicans included on the panel.

Cheney is scheduled to appear on ABC’s “This Week” and CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Rep. Peter MeijerPeter MeijerWest Virginia lawmaker slams GOP colleague over support for infrastructure law Trump endorses primary challenger to Peter Meijer in Michigan The 9 Republicans who voted to hold Bannon in contempt of Congress MORE (R-Mich.), who does not sit on the committee, initially voted in favor of a bill to set up a congressional investigation into the events of Jan. 6. Along with Cheney, Kinzinger and seven other House Republicans, he also voted to impeach Trump last year following the riot.

In June, however, Meijer and those seven other House GOP members who supported impeachment voted the party line against the creation of the select committee investigating Jan. 6. The group argued that a panel including only two Republicans would be overly partisan.

Meijer is scheduled to appear on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Bennie ThompsonBennie Gordon ThompsonJan. 6 committee hoping to issue interim report by summer: report Jim Jordan says he has ‘real concerns’ with Jan. 6 panel after sit-down request Jan. 6 panel seeks sit-down with Jim Jordan MORE (D-Miss.), chair of the House’s select committee on Jan. 6, is also scheduled to appear on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” as well as ABC’s “This Week” and CNN’s “State of the Union.”

Rep. Adam SchiffAdam Bennett Schiff Rep. Mike Turner to replace Nunes in top House Intel spot The top political books of 2021 Jim Jordan says he has ‘real concerns’ with Jan. 6 panel after sit-down request MORE (D-Calif.), who also sits on the committee, is scheduled to appear on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiBidens react to Betty White’s death: ‘A lovely lady’ The 9 politicians who had the most impact in 2021 Pelosi announces series of events to mark Jan. 6 anniversary MORE (D-Calif.) announced earlier this week the full schedule of activities to commemorate Jan. 6, including a conversation with historians Jon Meacham and Doris Kearns Goodwin, a moment of silence and a prayer vigil.


Below is the full list of guests scheduled to appear on this week’s Sunday talk shows:

ABC’s “This Week”Dr. Anthony FauciAnthony FauciMichigan shifts, will follow CDC isolation guidance 2021’s top political celebrity moments These 3 issues will clobber Democrats in 2022   MORE, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; New York City Eric Adams (D); Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.)

NBC’s “Meet the Press” — Thompson; Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Mich.)

CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Cheney; Education Secretary Miguel CardonaMiguel CardonaBiden to sign order to streamline government services to public Democrats worry their grip on Hispanic vote is loosening School staffing shortages can’t wait: The Biden administration is taking action MORE; Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.;) Robert Pape, political science professor at the University of Chicago.

CNN’s “State of the Union” — Thompson, Fauci; Gov. Larry Hogan (R-Md.)

“Fox News Sunday” — Cardona; Gov. Asa HutchinsonAsa HutchinsonThe Memo: COVID surge multiplies dangers for Biden Overnight Health Care — CDC cuts isolation time for the asymptomatic GOP governor thanks Biden for efforts to ‘depoliticize’ pandemic response MORE (R-Ark.); U.S. Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger.

Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures” – Sen. Roger MarshallRoger W. MarshallSenate GOP introduces resolution to nix Biden health worker vaccine mandate Physician-lawmakers team up to urge boosters Democrats outraged after Manchin opposes Biden spending bill MORE (R-Kansas), Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.), Rep. Mike TurnerMichael Ray Turner Rep. Mike Turner to replace Nunes in top House Intel spot The Memo: Biden, bruised by Afghanistan, faces a critical test in Ukraine House lawmakers press Pentagon over Afghanistan withdrawal MORE (R-Ohio), Jon Taffer “Bar Rescue” Host

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Hailey Bieber Details Terrifying ‘Life-Altering’ Mini-Stroke She Suffered And Procedure To Close Hole In Her Heart



Hailey Bieber has spoken out in her “own words” about the “life-altering,” “scariest moment” of her life she had after suffering what she called a mini-stroke, and later underwent a procedure to close a hole in her heart.

The 25-year-old supermodel and wife of superstar singer Justin Bieber took to her YouTube channel Wednesday and opened up about the terrifying experience of being hospitalized last month after she suffered a blood clot to her brain that traveled through a hole in her heart between 12 and 13 millimeters, reported People magazine.

“I had, like, a very scary incident on March 10, basically,” Bieber shared. “I was sitting at breakfast with my husband, having a normal day … and all of the sudden, I felt this really weird sensation that kind of like traveled down my arm from my shoulder all the way down to my fingertips. And it made my fingertips feel really numb and weird.”

“Justin [her husband] was like, ‘Are you okay?’” she added, as she explained that she tried to respond to him, but she “couldn’t speak.” “The right side of my face started drooping; I couldn’t get a sentence out.”

“Obviously, immediately, I thought I was having a stroke,” the supermodel continued. “He thought I was having a stroke. Right away, he asked for somebody to please call 911 and get a doctor.”

Hailey said that where they were, there happened to be a medic who started asking her lots of questions and testing her arms, calling it definitely the “scariest moment” of her life. The model talked about how the “facial drooping lasted for probably like thirty seconds.” Her speech did came back, but her “anxiety” about what was happening just made “everything worse.”

“By the time I got to the emergency room, I was pretty much back to normal – [I] could talk, [I] wasn’t having any issues with my face or my arm,” Bieber explained.

She said scans revealed she had, in fact, suffered a “small blood clot” to her brain which was labeled a “TIA” [Transient Ischemic Attack]. Hailey told her followers it was basically like having a “mini-stroke.”

Doctors still weren’t sure what caused it, but she said it was widely believed it was a combination of birth-control issues, recently having COVID-19, and having just traveled “to Paris and back in a very short amount of time,” calling it a “perfect storm.”

Further testing at the University of California, Los Angeles, revealed Bieber had a Grade 5 PFO [a small opening in the heart that usually closes after birth]. The outlet said the hold measured between 12 and 13 millimeters. She later underwent a procedure to close the hole, and said it went “very smoothly” and she’s recovering.

“The biggest thing I feel is I just feel really relieved that we were able to figure everything out, that we were able to get it closed, that I will be able to just move on from this really scary situation and just live my life,” Hailey shared.

“If there’s anybody that watches this that has gone through the same thing or something similar, I definitely really empathize with you,” she concluded. “And I understand how life-altering and scary it is.”

Bieber, who’s the daughter of actor Stephen Baldwin and Kennya Baldwin, married her husband Justin in 2018.

Related: Hailey Baldwin Credits Christian Faith For Marriage To Justin Bieber

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies for breaking news, investigative reporting, sports, podcasts, in-depth analysis, books, and entertainment for a reason: because we believe in what we do. We believe in our country, in the value of truth and the freedom to speak it, and in the right to challenge tyranny wherever we see it. Believe the same? Become a member now and join our mission.

Source link

Continue Reading


Wikipedia’s Left-Wing Bias



I love Wikipedia. I donated thousands of dollars to the Wikimedia Foundation.

Before Wikipedia, all we had were printed encyclopedias—out of date by the time we bought them.

Then libertarian Jimmy Wales came up with a web-based, crowd-sourced encyclopedia.

Crowd-sourced? A Britannica editor called Wikipedia “a public restroom.” But Wales won the battle. Britannica’s encyclopedias are no longer printed.

Congratulations to Wales.

But recently, I learned that Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger now says Wikipedia’s political pages have turned into leftist “propaganda.”

That’s upsetting. Leftists took over the editing?

Sadly, yes. I checked it out.

All editing is done by volunteers. Wales hoped there would be enough diverse political persuasions that biases would be countered by others.

But that’s not what’s happening.

Leftists just like to write. Conservatives build things: companies, homes, farms.

You see the pattern comparing political donations from different professions: Surgeons, oil workers, truck drivers, loggers, and pilots lean right; artists, bartenders, librarians, reporters, and teachers lean left.

Conservatives don’t have as much time to tweet or argue on the web. Leftists do. And they love doing it. This helps them take over the media, universities, and now, Wikipedia.

Jonathan Weiss is what Wikipedia calls a “Top 100” Wikipedian because he’s made almost half a million edits. He says he’s noticed new bias: “Wikipedia does a great job on things like science and sports, but you see a lot of political bias come into play when you’re talking current events.”

Weiss is no conservative. In presidential races, he voted for Al Gore, Ralph Nader, and Barack Obama. Never for a Republican. “I’ve really never identified strongly with either political party,” he says.

Maybe that’s why he notices the new Wikipedia bias.

“People on the left far outweigh people on the center and the right … a lot [are] openly socialist and Marxist.” Some even post pictures of Che Guevara and Lenin on their own profiles.

These are the people who decide which news sources Wikipedia writers may cite. Wikipedia’s approved “Reliable sources” page rejects political reporting from Fox but calls CNN and MSNBC “reliable.”

Good conservative outlets like The Federalist, the Daily Caller, and The Daily Wire are all deemed “unreliable.” Same with the New York Post (That’s probably why Wikipedia called Hunter Biden’s emails a conspiracy theory even after other liberal media finally acknowledged that they were real).

While it excludes Fox, Wikipedia approves even hard left media like Vox, Slate, The Nation, Mother Jones, and Jacobin, a socialist publication.

Until recently, Wikipedia’s “socialism” and “communism” pages made no mention of the millions of people killed by socialism and communism. Even now, deaths are “deep in the article,” says Weiss, “treated as an arcane academic debate. But we’re talking about mass murder!”

The communism page even adds that we cannot ignore the “lives saved by communist modernization”! This is nuts.

Look up “concentration and internment camps” and you’ll find, along with the Holocaust, “Mexico-United States border,” and under that, “Trump administration family separation policy.”

What? Former President Donald Trump’s border controls, no matter how harsh, are very different from the Nazi’s mass murder.

Wikipedia does say “anyone can edit.” So, I made a small addition for political balance, mentioning that President Barack Obama built those cages.

My edit was taken down.

I wrote Wikipedia founder Wales to say that if his creation now uses only progressive sources, I would no longer donate.

He replied, “I totally respect the decision not to give us more money. I’m such a fan and have great respect for you and your work.” But then he said it is “just 100% false … that ‘only globalist, progressive mainstream sources’ are permitted.”

He gave examples of left-wing media that Wikipedia rejects, like Raw Story and Occupy Democrats.

I’m glad he rejects them. Those sites are childishly far left.

I then wrote again to ask why “there’s not a single right-leaning media outlet Wiki labels ‘reliable’ about politics, [but] Vox, Slate, The Nation, Mother Jones, CNN, MSNBC” get approval.

Wales then stopped responding to my emails.

Unless Wikipedia’s bias is fixed, I’ll be skeptical reading anything on the site.


The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation. 

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email, and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. 

Source link

Continue Reading


Public Health England to blame for sending patients to care homes without Covid tests



Speaking on condition of anonymity, Whitehall officials alleged that Prof Duncan Selbie, the former PHE chief executive, was ultimately responsible for informing Mr Hancock of the risks.

Prof Selbie is working as a senior adviser to the DHSC. Neither he nor the department responded to requests for comment on Wednesday.

Mr Hancock, who was replaced by Sajid Javid last year, claimed the High Court ruling had exonerated him and the had been cleared “of any wrongdoing” because PHE “failed to tell ministers what they knew about asymptomatic transmission”.

The High Court judges concluded that care home policies in March and April 2020 were “irrational” because they failed to advise that those discharged from hospitals “should, so far as practicable, be kept apart from other residents for up to 14 days”.

“Since there is no evidence that this question was considered by the secretary of state, or that he was asked to consider it, it is not an example of a political judgment on a finely balanced issue,” they said. “Nor is it a point on which any of the expert committees had advised that no guidance was required.”

After the ruling, Boris Johnson said he wanted to “renew my apologies and sympathies” to relatives who lost loved ones, adding: “The thing we didn’t know in particular was that Covid could be transmitted asymptomatically in the way that it was.”

However, the risks of asymptomatic transmission had been highlighted by Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government’s chief scientific adviser for England, who said it was “quite likely” as early as March 13 2020. Varying levels of risk had been outlined in papers from late January, the ruling said.

The judicial review was brought by Dr Cathy Gardner and Fay Harris, whose fathers, Michael Gibson and Donald Harris, died after testing positive for Covid.

‘Opens the floodgates for potential claims’

Paul Conrathe, a solicitor at Sinclairslaw who was instructed by both women, said: “It’s possible that care home providers and relatives who lost loved ones in the first wave could bring compensation claims. The Government was found to have acted ‘irrationally’ – that’s a very high legal hurdle.”

Nadra Ahmed, who chairs the National Care Association, said the ruling “opens the floodgates for potential claims to be brought against government policy”.

“This will be especially pertinent where the individual was not given a choice,” she said. “There will be a lot of people assimilating to the information as they consider if the loss of their loved one was premature, and holding the Government to account is the only way forward for them.”

Helen Wildbore, the director of the Relatives and Residents Association, said that the ruling proved “the protective ring around care homes was non-existent” and that older people were “abandoned at the outset of the pandemic”.

A government spokesman said it had been a “very difficult decision” to discharge hospital patients into care homes, taken when evidence on asymptomatic transmission was “extremely uncertain”.

The spokesman added: “We acknowledge the judge’s comments on assessing the risks of asymptomatic transmission and our guidance on isolation, and will respond in more detail in due course.”

‘He was in a home and should have been safe’

They stood outside the Royal Courts of Justice, two women unknown to each other before the Covid pandemic but brought together by tragedy, writes Tom Ough.

Cathy Gardner spoke first, delivering a steely reading of a statement. Matt Hancock’s boast of a “protective ring” encircling care homes, Dr Gardner said, was “a despicable lie of which he ought to be ashamed and for which he ought to apologise”.

Fay Harris, more downcast in demeanour but no less forthright, told journalists: “I have lost precious years with my wonderful Dad.”

Both women lost their fathers in early 2020, arguing that they might still be alive were it not for hospital patients having been discharged into care homes without having been tested for Covid.

Michael Gibson, born in 1931, had been a superintendent registrar of births and deaths. “He was in a home and should have been safe,” Dr Gardner told The Independent after his death.

Mr Gibson, who had advanced dementia, had fallen ill a couple of weeks before the first lockdown. Staff at his care home were unable to procure tests for Covid, but the virus is believed to have struck him down.

Source link

Continue Reading