Connect with us

Politics

Jill Biden Got a Raise—Here’s Her College Teaching Salary

Published

on

First lady Jill Biden got a raise at her faculty job at Northern Virginia Community College, where she teaches English. 

The community college confirmed to The Daily Signal that the first lady’s salary is $90,299. That’s up from the $85,999 a year for her previously reported contract stretching from August 2021 to May 2022. 

While not particularly high to some, the pay appears to be above industry standards for Jill Biden’s peers.

The real median household income in America is $70,784, according to the Census Bureau.

News of the raise for President Joe Biden’s wife comes as the incoming Republican majority in the House of Representatives announced plans to investigate potential influence peddling by the Biden family. 

The pay hike reflects the Virginia Community College System’s salary schedule for the 2022-2023 school year for Northern Virginia, according to the community college. 

The state’s community college system pay scales are examined and adjusted each July by the VCCS State Board after a new state budget takes effect.

The first lady has a teaching schedule of 12 credit hours for each semester, a spokesperson for Northern Virginia Community College told The Daily Signal. 

Jill Biden did not want the community college to publicize her employment, according to reporting from CBS News and The New York Times. Because of this, she is listed as “J. Tracy,” the Times reported. CBS reported the first lady also was listed as simply “Jill T. Biden.”

The White House did not respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment by publication time. The First lady’s spokesperson Vanessa Valdivia initially said in an email Wednesday she would respond to questions for the story later in the afternoon but did not have a statement by late Wednesday.

The community college spokesperson told The Daily Signal that the first lady teaches 12 credit hours. The NVCC course catalog lists two courses, English 111, College Composition, using the keyword “J. Tracy.” One is at the Alexandria campus, the other is a Zoom course. No courses are listed under the name Biden. 

According to the website Open Payrolls, in the 2020-2021 year, Biden earned 6.3% higher than the average pay for her co-workers as professors at the community college, and made 22.1% more than the national average for government employees. 

The Northern Virginia area is among the highest in the U.S. for the cost of living. The website also notes that Jill Biden earns 12.7% more than the average university or college professor.  

According to Indeed, the average pay for NVCC faculty is $67,143 per year. The higher-end salary is $87,171. However, Glassdoor reported media salaries for the community college at $103,775. 

The Constitution’s emoluments clause prohibits a president from profiting from the office. But that prohibition doesn’t extend to family members. 

After a review by the White House and in consultation with the community college, they determined she would be paid through the NOVA Foundation, a 501(c)(3) that while associated with NVCC, does not receive any direct government funding. 

“I am an English teacher at NOVA—not First Lady,” the first lady wrote to NVCC colleagues after her husband’s inauguration as president Jan. 20, 2021, CBS reported. “I am trying to keep my roles separate as I did as Second Lady. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I want students to see me as their English teacher. I am not mentioning it in my classes AT ALL. Thanks for honoring my teacher identity. Jill.”

The National Legal and Policy Center, a good government group, consistently has raised concerns about the lack of transparency for funding of the Penn Biden Center at the University of Pennsylvania and the Biden Institute at the University of Delaware. 

“If Jill Biden was making more than similarly situated members of faculty, it’s part of a pattern that, it seems, higher education has been very good to the Bidens,” Peter Flaherty, president of the National Legal and Policy Center, told The Daily Signal.

The House Oversight and Reform Committee should consider looking into aspects of this along with the bigger picture of the Biden family’s earnings, Flaherty added. 

“The House committee should explore all the connections of higher education and the Biden family to see if there has been preferential treatment,” Flaherty said.  

Under the 2021 American Rescue Plan, a stimulus bill that Biden signed into law, the U.S. Department of Education awarded $70 million to Northern Virginia Community College, and primarily is used for student financial aid, according to the community college’s website.

In the prior year, President Donald Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, also known as the CARES Act. Under it, NVCC got $10 million toward emergency student financial aid and another $10 million for institutional funding.

Trump later signed the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, which awarded $44.1 million to NVCC, of which $11 million was used for student financial aid.

This report was modified within three hours of publication to include recent federal funding of Northern Virginia Community College and a reference to median household income.

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Returning to Pre-Trump ‘Dead Consensus’ GOP Would Be Big Mistake

Published

on

In the aftermath of the Republican Party’s recent midterm elections debacle, Right-liberal sharks are circling. These devoted acolytes of what a prominent 2019 First Things manifesto called the American Right’s “dead consensus” think they see blood in the water. Indeed, the “dead consensus” Praetorian Guard has apparently decided that now is the time for a counterattack against the more nationalist- and populist-inclined forces of what has broadly been dubbed the “New Right.”

A recent anti-national conservatism fusillade from The Federalist’s David Harsanyi is reflective of the broader subgenre.

The opportunistic timing of this ascendant strand of argumentation is as obvious as its logic is facile. The basic argument is: Donald Trump the individual is largely inextricable from the substantive political commitments of the “New Right”; Trump was primarily responsible for the GOP’s ballot box losses last month; therefore, the “New Right” is at “best” vicariously responsible itself, and at “worst” is merely hurting badly. Either way, Republicans’ midterm election disappointments present, for beleaguered right-liberals, a perfect opportunity to turn the tables and go on the offensive.

This cynical strategy must not succeed. A return to the “dead consensus” status quo ante would be a disaster for the American Right and the Republican Party—and thus for the nation as a whole.

Trump’s manifold personal flaws and recent headline-grabbing self-inflicted wounds aside, there is still much to learn from his dominance of the 2016 Republican presidential primary field.

Trump ran to the “right” of his median competitor on some issues, such as immigration, but he ran well to the “left” of his median competitor on other issues, such as trade, health care, and entitlements. On foreign policy, he was the most critical of all candidates on the debate stage of the instinctive ultra-hawkishness that had become post-Cold War GOP orthodoxy.

While it is impossible to ignore the dominant halo effect of Trump’s global celebrity status, GOP primary voters also rallied to Trump’s nationalist, populist strand of conservatism. He broke through the Democrats’ Rust Belt “blue wall” in the general election, upsetting Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin (not coincidentally, all states that were disproportionate victims of globalization).

He narrowly lost those same states in 2020, but all of them—along with Wisconsin’s western neighbor, Minnesota—are now considerably closer each election cycle, in the age of this more nationalist and populist GOP, than they were during the “dead consensus”/”zombie Reaganism” years of the 1990s through the mid-2010s.

Other examples abound. Also in the Midwest, Ohio, Iowa, and Missouri—which were swing states in the not-so-distant past—now all look comfortably red. North Carolina and (especially) Indiana, which went blue for Barack Obama in 2008, are looking pretty red these days as well.

Virginia went red in 2021 due to Glenn Youngkin’s “culture war”-centric gubernatorial campaign, and even New York state heavily flirted last month with Rep. Lee Zeldin’s law-and-order/crime-centric gubernatorial bid (ditto New Jersey in 2021).

Out west, Nevada is now one of the swingiest states in the whole country, a far cry from the easy wins there for Obama in both 2008 and 2012. In the southeast, Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., the American Right’s preeminent culture warrior, has transformed the once-iconic swing state of Florida into the new capital for red state America.

On the other side of the ledger, there are only two electorally significant states one can point to that are notably bluer now than they were a decade or two ago: Georgia and Arizona. That is pretty much it.

A basic empirical assessment of the American citizenry’s stipulated policy preferences confirms the intuition that a more nationalist- and populist-inflected GOP is better suited for electoral success. In June 2017, political scientist Lee Drutman used 2016 election data to plot out voters in a standard scatterplot quadrant, with an X-axis of “economic dimension” of “liberal” to “conservative,” and a Y-axis of “social/identity dimension” of “liberal” to “conservative.”

The upshot: Those who lean “right” of center on social/cultural issues comprised a 51.6% majority, but those who lean “right” of center on economic issues made up a paltry 26.5% minority. (As has been frequently noted, the oft-discussed “economically conservative, but socially liberal” voter comprised a minuscule 3.8% of the 2016 electorate.)

There is exceedingly little political appetite for the kind of laissez-faire absolutism, free-trade maximalism, and fiscal austerity that long dominated the pre-Trump GOP, and which still dominates its American Enterprise Institute-donating, Wall Street Journal editorial page-reading donor class.

In fact, the key above all else to Trump’s 2016 triumph was his exploitation of the gap between the GOP’s realist, working-class base and its ideological, business-centric donor class—a gap Trump was able to exploit due to his personal wealth and the ubiquitous unpaid media he generated.

From an American national interest perspective, the era of globalization has long since reached what economists refer to as the point of decreasing marginal returns. True, consumer prices on Amazon are perhaps a bit lower, in inflation-adjusted terms. But that is extremely little solace, as globalization has helped offshore entire industries, corrode entire regions, exacerbate epidemics of loneliness and depression, and flood the nation’s interior with criminal aliens and lethal fentanyl alike.

The voters are correct to intuit this reality, and the Republican Party is now a working-class party, whether or not its own elites accept that fact.

Ronald Reagan’s presidency was a highly successful one, but many of his would-be successors have fundamentally botched his legacy, retconning the Gipper as some sort of obstinate libertarian dogmatist. But Reagan, who once slapped import quotas on Japanese automakers to stimulate America’s own auto production, was no such thing.

Above all else, the man who defeated the Soviet Union was a winner. And time and time again, the market-idolatrous, culture war-shirking “dead consensus” Right has been shown to be a loser. Therein lies the rub.

COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM

The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Antibiotics could have saved my child, says father of seven-year-old victim

Published

on

Data show iGAS rates have soared to a level more than four times higher than they were before the Covid pandemic, with more child deaths already this winter than in a normal year.

Strep A infection is common and mostly leads to tonsillitis or strep throat and is easily treatable with antibiotics, namely penicillin in the UK.

But doctors are under increasing pressure to cut down on the amount of antibiotics they prescribe as a result of the rise of superbugs – bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.

Superbugs are predicted to kill 10 million people a year by 2050, with experts saying this “silent pandemic” is humanity’s gravest threat.

The UK health authorities have previously trialled paying healthcare providers to cut down on their antibiotic prescription levels and set a target of slashing prescription by 15 per cent.

The British Medical Association pushed back against plans to let pharmacists prescribe antibiotics as “antibiotics are a precious resource and should be prescribed only when absolutely necessary”.

But while antibiotics are overprescribed by around 40 per cent, and often given for colds caused by viruses which are impervious to the drugs, there are no tests available to GPs to tell whether a sick child has a bacterial or a viral infection.

As a result, doctors are tasked with cutting down on giving out antibiotics without really knowing which patients need them and which ones do not.

‘Slightly mad’ that doctors have to use guesswork

“The price of an antibiotic currently is always cheaper than the price of a diagnostic,” says Jim O’Neil, the economist behind the seminal 2016 review of antimicrobial resistance commissioned by then prime minister David Cameron.

“It seems to me slightly mad, as brilliant as doctors are, that they guess whether somebody wants an antibiotic in the first place, and then what kind of antibiotic,” Lord O’Neill said.

But now, while progress has been made in reducing antibiotic prescriptions, a bacterial infection which is easily treatable has killed six children who may have survived if given antibiotics earlier.

Strep A is a bacteria sometimes found in the throat or on the skin and caught through close contact and from coughing and sneezing and normally leads to Strep throat.

In severe cases it can lead to iGAS if it gets into the bloodstream via cracks in the skin or if a child has a weakened immune system. iGAS can lead to sepsis or shock and, in extremely rare cases, meningitis, and can rapidly kill a patient.

Data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) shows that in pre-pandemic times for children aged between one and four years old there were 0.5 cases of iGAS per 100,000. However, the current figure is 2.3 per 100,000.

For children aged between five and nine years old it has more than tripled, up from 0.3 per 100,000 to 1.1 per 100,000.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Britney Spears fans left confused as star PRAISES ‘inspiring’ sister Jamie Lynn

Published

on

Britney Spears has offered her estranged sister Jamie Lynn Spears some rare praise despite previously calling her ‘scum’ and accusing her of ‘f***ing lying’ in her controversial memoir released earlier this year.

In an Instagram post shared Friday, the singer – who is celebrating her 41st birthday – congratulated her ‘brave’ and ‘inspiring’ little sister, 31, for baring her soul in a promo clip for her Fox’s Special Forces, a military-style competition show for celebrities.

Shortly after the post was published, fans of the Toxic singer expressed confusion in the comment section — even speculating that Britney may no longer be in control of her Instagram account.

‘It’s my b-day but you’re my heart so I’m thinking about you … congratulations on being so brave, inspiring, and showing guts and glory in your show !!!’ Britney began.

Rare: Britney Spears has offered her estranged sister Jamie Lynn Spears some rare praise despite previously calling her ‘scum’ and accusing her of ‘f***ing lying’ in her controversial memoir released earlier this year; Britney seen in November

She then appeared to reply to Jamie Lynn’s quote about wanting to feel ‘worth something’ and escape her sister’s shadow by ‘proving herself’ on the cut-throat program, which will premiere January 4, 2023. 

‘You ain’t alone … if anybody knows what that feels like … I get it’ wrote Britney, who was clearly alluding to her now-terminated conservatorship.

‘My baby sister !!! I love you !!!’ the pop star concluded.

Along with her heartfelt message, Britney included two photos of Jamie Lynn strumming a guitar and posing on a bar stool. 

Raw and real: In an Instagram post shared Friday, the singer - who is celebrating her 41st birthday - congratulated her 'brave' and 'inspiring' little sister, 31, for baring her soul in a promo clip for her Fox's Special Forces, a military-style competition show for celebrities

Raw and real: In an Instagram post shared Friday, the singer – who is celebrating her 41st birthday – congratulated her ‘brave’ and ‘inspiring’ little sister, 31, for baring her soul in a promo clip for her Fox’s Special Forces, a military-style competition show for celebrities

'It's my b-day but you're my heart so I'm thinking about you … congratulations on being so brave, inspiring, and showing guts and glory in your show !!!' Britney began

‘It’s my b-day but you’re my heart so I’m thinking about you … congratulations on being so brave, inspiring, and showing guts and glory in your show !!!’ Britney began

Confused: Fans expressed their confusion over Britney's post, with one user saying the singer was simply throwing shade at her younger sister

Confused: Fans expressed their confusion over Britney’s post, with one user saying the singer was simply throwing shade at her younger sister 

Explaining: Another user wrote that she was just 'being sarcastic' because 'Jamie Lynn always wants to make things about herself'

Explaining: Another user wrote that she was just ‘being sarcastic’ because ‘Jamie Lynn always wants to make things about herself’

Social media users and followers quickly jumped to the comment section to express their utter confusion in regards to Britney’s post. 

One wrote that the post, ‘has to be shade,’ while another stated, ‘The math ain’t mathing Brit.’ 

Others typed that they believed she was not in control of her own Instagram account, with one follower stating, ‘Her man has her account now. He’s part of the plan. I’m convinced dad hired him. I said what I said.’ Another jokingly wrote, ‘Jamie Lynn get off Britney’s ig,’ followed by a laughing emoji. 

‘Someone stole her account,’ a user expressed, with another follower penning, ‘Y’all she’s being sarcastic because Jamie Lynn always wants to make things about herself.’ 

Another appeared to be completely surprised, writing, ‘Oh y’all friends again?’  

Not in charge: One follower believed that her husband had taken over Britney's Instagram account

Not in charge: One follower believed that her husband had taken over Britney’s Instagram account 

Snaps: Along with her heartfelt message, Britney included two photos of Jamie Lynn strumming a guitar and posing on a bar stool

Snaps: Along with her heartfelt message, Britney included two photos of Jamie Lynn strumming a guitar and posing on a bar stool

Responses: Another jokingly typed out, 'Jamie Lynn get off Britney's ig,' hinting that the singer's younger sister had uploaded the post

Responses: Another jokingly typed out, ‘Jamie Lynn get off Britney’s ig,’ hinting that the singer’s younger sister had uploaded the post 

Surprised: Another follower appeared to be completely surprised, writing, 'Oh y'all friends again?'

Surprised: Another follower appeared to be completely surprised, writing, ‘Oh y’all friends again?’

Fans continued to scratch their head as the Louisiana native returned to the platform to post a topless selfie.

She lifted up her bust with her hands, but covered her nipples with a set of flower emojis, as she relaxed on the sand at a tropical destination.

Britney has publicly feuded with Jamie Lynn since speaking out about her alleged treatment while under her nearly 14-year conservatorship. This contention resulted in Britney not inviting her ‘baby sister’ to her wedding to actor Sam Asghari, 28, in June. 

Not buying it: Shortly after the post was published, fans of the Toxic singer expressed confusion in the comment section — even speculating that Britney may no longer be in control of her Instagram account

Not buying it: Shortly after the post was published, fans of the Toxic singer expressed confusion in the comment section — even speculating that Britney may no longer be in control of her Instagram account

The sisters seen in 2003

The sisters seen in 2003

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending