Connect with us


Jan. 6 panel has ‘firsthand testimony’ that Ivanka asked Trump to intervene during Capitol riot, Liz Cheney says



The House panel investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot has testimony that then-President Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump asked him to intervene as his supporters ransacked the home of Congress, Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., said Sunday.

“We have firsthand testimony now that he was sitting in the dining room next to the Oval Office, watching the attack. The briefing room at the White House is a mere few steps from the Oval Office,” Cheney, vice chair of the committee, said on ABC News’ “This Week.”

She added that at any moment, Trump could have walked to the press briefing room and appeared on television.

“We know as [Trump] was sitting there in the dining room, next to the Oval Office, members of his staff were pleading with him to go on television to tell people to stop. We know [Republican] Leader [Kevin] McCarthy was pleading with him to do that. We know his daughter — we have firsthand testimony — that his daughter Ivanka went in at least twice to ask him to please stop this violence.”

In a one-minute video released on social media hours after the attack began, Trump repeated false claims about the election he lost while encouraging the rioters, who attacked the Capitol in an attempt to disrupt the electoral vote count formalizing Joe Biden’s win before a joint session of Congress, to “go home in peace.”

“Go home. We love you. You’re very special,” Trump said.

After the video was shared, he later tweeted, “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long.”

Twitter took action against both messages, and permanently suspended Trump in the days after the riot, citing “the risk of further incitement of violence.”

Thompson said on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that the panel believes Trump made “several videos” before releasing the short clip and that it has asked the National Archives for the alleged videos that were never shared.

“It’s about 187 minutes,” he said in an interview that aired Sunday, in reference to the length of time it took for Trump to publicly urge his supporters to leave the Capitol after the attack began.

Representatives for the former president and Ivanka Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Over the past few months, the Jan. 6 committee has been accelerating its probe into the riot, as well as any actions or inaction by Trump and his allies. The House voted last month to refer former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to the Justice Department for a criminal charge over his refusal to answer the committee’s questions.

The panel also recently asked Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., and Scott Perry, R-Pa., to provide information about their activities, although committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said Sunday that the panel’s ability to subpoena the lawmakers remains uncertain.

As the anniversary of Jan. 6 nears, Thompson appeared on three separate Sunday programs to discuss the congressional probe into the deadly event as well as the pro-Trump rally that preceded it. The then-president spoke at the rally and encouraged those there to march to the Capitol, where Congress was engaged in formalizing President Joe Biden’s election win.

Thompson said the panel has evidence of interactions between House members and rioters on Jan. 6 that may or may not necessarily be of a significant nature. He did not specify which members.

“Now, ‘assisted’ means different things,” he said on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.” “Some took pictures with people who came to the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally. Some, you know, allowed them to come and associate in their offices and other things during that whole rally week. So, there’s some participation.”

Thompson also said the panel intends to recommend new legislation to improve U.S. intelligence gathering, which if adopted, hopefully will ensure “this will never, ever happen again.”

“As you know, it was clear that we were not apprised that something would happen. But for the most part that it was the worst-kept secret in America that people were coming into Washington, and the potential for coordination and what we saw was there. So, we want to make sure that never happens again,” Thompson said on ABC News’ “This Week.”

A Senate report released in June, which was the result of a joint investigation by the Homeland Security and Rules committees, summed up what it says were profound intelligence and security failures that contributed to one of the worst incidents of domestic terrorism in U.S. history.

The report found that a key contributing factor to the events of Jan. 6 was the failure of the intelligence community to “properly analyze, assess, and disseminate information to law enforcement” regarding the potential for violence and the known threats to the Capitol.

In the report, one unnamed Capitol police officer was quoted as saying, “We were ill prepared. We were NOT informed with intelligence. We were betrayed.”

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said the Jan. 6 riot was, “in part, an intelligence failure that is the failure to see all the evidence that was out there to be seen of the propensity for violence that day,” on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

The Jan. 6 committee will also recommend legislation on how to improve the coordination of resources to protect the Capitol, according to Thompson.

“There were significant inconsistencies in coordination. The National Guard from the District of Columbia was slow to respond, not on its own but it had to go to the Department of Defense,” he told “This Week.” “We want to make sure that the line of communication between the Capitol police and the structure of how we make decisions is clear. Right now, it’s kind of a hybrid authority and that authority clearly broke down.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Teladoc Tumbled 38% After Big First-Quarter Loss. Is It Just a Pandemic Play?



Text size

Source link

Continue Reading


After pandemic drop, Canada’s detention of immigrants rises again By Reuters



© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Two closed Canadian border checkpoints are seen after it was announced that the border would close to “non-essential traffic” to combat the spread of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at the U.S.-Canada border crossing at the Thousand Isla

By Anna Mehler Paperny

TORONTO (Reuters) – Canada is locking up more people in immigration detention without charge after the numbers fell during the pandemic, government data obtained by Reuters shows.

Authorities cite an overall rise in foreign travelers amid easing restrictions but lawyers say their detained clients came to Canada years ago.

Canada held 206 people in immigration detention as of March 1, 2022 – a 28% increase compared with March 1 of the previous year. Immigration detainees have not been charged with crimes in Canada and 68% of detainees as of March 1 were locked up because Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) fears they are “unlikely to appear” at an immigration hearing, according to the data.

The rise puts Canada at odds with Amnesty International and other human rights groups that have urged Ottawa to end its use of indefinite immigration detention, noting CBSA has used factors such as a person’s mental illness as reason to detain them.

A CBSA spokesperson told Reuters that “when the number of entries (to Canada) goes up, an increase in detention is to be expected.” CBSA has said in the past it uses detention as a last resort.

A lawyer told Reuters her detained clients have been in Canada for years.

In the United Kingdom, too, immigration detention levels rose last year after dropping earlier in the pandemic, according to government statistics. Unlike Canada, the United States and Australia, European Union member states have limits on immigration detention and those limits cannot exceed six months.

The rise in detentions puts people at risk of contracting COVID-19 in harsh congregate settings, refugee lawyers say.

Julia Sande, Human Rights Law and Policy Campaigner with Amnesty, called the increase in detentions “disappointing but not surprising,” although she was reluctant to draw conclusions from limited data.

The number of immigration detainees in Canada dropped early in the pandemic, from a daily average of 301 in the fourth quarter (January through March) of 2019-20 to 126 in the first quarter (April through June) of 2020-21.


Detaining fewer people did not result in a significant increase in no-shows at immigration hearings – the most common reason for detention, according to Immigration and Refugee Board data.

The average number of no-shows as a percentage of admissibility hearings was about 5.5% in 2021, according to that data, compared to about 5.9% in 2019.

No-shows rose as high as 16% in October 2020, but a spokesperson for the Immigration and Refugee Board said this was due to people not receiving notifications when their hearings resumed after a pause in the pandemic.

Refugee lawyer Andrew Brouwer said the decline in detention earlier in the pandemic shows Canada does not need to lock up as many non-citizens.

“We didn’t see a bunch of no-shows. We didn’t see the sky fall … It for sure shows that the system can operate without throwing people in jail,” Brouwer said.

He added that detainees face harsh pandemic conditions in provincial jails – including extended lockdowns, sometimes with three people in a cell for 23 hours a day.

Refugee lawyer Swathi Sekhar said CBSA officials and the Immigration and Refugee Board members reviewing detentions took the risk of COVID-19 into account when deciding whether someone should be detained earlier in the pandemic but are doing so less now.

“Their position is that COVID is not a factor that should weigh in favor of release,” she said.

“We also see very, very perverse findings … [decision-makers] outright saying that individuals are going to be safer in jail.”

The Immigration and Refugee Board did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Source link

Continue Reading


Nasdaq futures rise as market attempts comeback from April sell-off, Meta shares soar



Stock futures rose in overnight trading as the market shook off the April sell-off and investors reacted positively to earnings from Meta Platforms.

Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 70 points or 0.2%. S&P 500 futures gained 0.7% and Nasdaq 100 futures jumped 1.2%.

The moves came as shares of Meta surged more than 18% after hours following a beat on earnings but a miss on revenue, a sign that investors may see signs of relief in the beaten-up tech sector. Shares were down 48% on the year heading into the results.

Meanwhile, shares of Qualcomm gained 5.6% in extended trading on the back of strong earnings while PayPal rose 5% despite issuing weak guidance for the second quarter.

“I think a lot of people want to believe that earnings are going to pull us out of this, but earnings are not what got us into this,” SoFi’s Liz Young told CNBC’s “Closing Bell: Overtime” on Wednesday. “… But the reality is there are so many macro headwinds still in front of us in the next 60 days that the market is just hard to impress.”

The after-hour activity followed a volatile regular trading session that saw the Nasdaq Composite stoop to its lowest level in 2022, as stocks looked to bounce back from a tech-led April sell-off. The index is down more than 12% since the start of April.

In Wednesday’s regular trading, the tech-heavy Nasdaq ended at 12,488.93, after rising to 1.7% at session highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 61.75 points, or 0.2%, to 33,301.93 propped up by gains from Visa and Microsoft, while the S&P 500 added 0.2% to 4,183.96.

Investors await big tech earnings on Thursday from Apple, Amazon and Twitter, along with results from Robinhood. Jobless claims are also due out Thursday.

Source link

Continue Reading