Connect with us


Conman pleads guilty to defrauding crossbow murder victim



On Thursday, the third day of his trial at Mold Crown Court, Lewis was re-arraigned on the charges and entered guilty pleas to four counts of fraud.

The 51-year-old admitted fraud by making false representations to Mr Corrigan and Ms Bailey relating to the sale and development of their house, Gof Du, the alleged purchase of horses, and the alleged purchase of a former schoolhouse in Llandona, Anglesey.

He also admitted fraud by making false representations to neighbour Aidan Maginn relating to the purchase of a horse.

His partner, Siwan Maclean, was charged entering into a money laundering arrangement, but, following Lewis’s pleas, Peter Rouch KC, prosecuting, said no evidence would be offered on the count and the jury was directed to find the 53-year-old not guilty.

The jurors were discharged from returning verdicts on the remaining seven counts Lewis faced and they were ordered to lie on file.

The court had been told that Mr Corrigan’s murder had nothing to do with the fraud, but the matters came to light when Mr Corrigan’s partner, Ms Bailey, was being interviewed by police after the shooting.

Opening the trial on Tuesday, Mr Rouch said: “Wyn Lewis is a conman. He is a fraudster.”

The court heard that Mr Corrigan and Ms Bailey had given an estimated £220,000 to Lewis and before his death Mr Corrigan was alleged to have told him: “There is no more money.”

Lewis originally stood trial in April 2021, but the jury was discharged due to illness.

A retrial began in January but the jury was discharged the following month due to legal issues.

In February 2020, Terence Whall was convicted of Mr Corrigan’s murder and jailed for a minimum of 31 years.

Sentencing him, Mrs Justice Jefford said Whall had “deprived Mr Corrigan’s family of any explanation for what was a horrific death in which Mr Corrigan was completely blameless”.

Lewis, of Llanfair-yn-Neubwll, Holyhead, is due to be sentenced on Friday.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Court Blocks Special Master Review Of Mar-A-Lago Documents



The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down on Thursday the special master’s review of the documents seized by the FBI during a raid on former President Donald Trump’s home.

The unanimous ruling sided with the Department of Justice and found that Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, did not have the jurisdiction to appoint a special master to review the case.

“We agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required,” the court’s ruling said.

The panel also reaffirmed that judicial interference in the early stages of DOJ investigations should only take place in “extraordinary” situations — a standard that they argued had not been met.

“It is indeed extraordinary for a warrant to be executed at the home of a former president – but not in a way that affects our legal analysis or otherwise gives the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation,” according to the panel.

The judges also argued that Cannon’s order represented a violation of the separation of powers. They argued that the “extraordinary” circumstances standard “guards against needless judicial intrusion into the course of criminal investigations — a sphere of power committed to the executive branch.”

The panel included George W. Bush appointee William Pryor, as well as two judges appointed during Trump’s tenure in office, according to Axios.

Cannon’s order from early September appointed a special master to determine if any of the over 11,000 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago fell under executive privilege. He was also given the power to serve as a mediator between the DOJ and Trump.

Trump’s legal team argued that a special master was necessary because some of the documents seized by the FBI were protected by executive privilege or attorney-client privilege, because Trump had the power to declassify the documents, and because the DOJ’s own dedicated privilege team did not have adequate “protocols” for this case, according to the ruling.

Cannon appointed Raymond Dearie, a senior U.S. district judge for the Eastern District of New York, to serve as special master in the case after Trump’s team proposed his appointment and the DOJ agreed.

Trump’s legal team has reportedly not yet decided whether to appeal the ruling.

The court’s ruling removes a barrier to the DOJ’s criminal investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified U.S. government records.

The DOJ announced on November 18 that Jack Smith, who has spent years at the International Criminal Court in The Hague prosecuting war crimes, will serve as the special counsel overseeing two of the department’s criminal investigations into Trump — including the investigation into the Mar-a-Lago documents.

Trump told Fox News in an exclusive interview after the announcement that he would not “partake in” the investigation.

“It is unfair to the country, to the Republican Party, and I don’t think people should accept it,” he added. “I am not going to accept it.”

Trump then asked why a special prosecutor had not been appointed in the DOJ’s criminal investigation of Hunter Biden.

“Why isn’t there a special counsel being set up for them?” Trump asked of Hunter and his father, President Joe Biden. “Tremendous corruption, they’re corrupt people, they’re criminals. I’ve done nothing wrong. They participated in massive criminal activity with many other nations.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Mermaids transgender charity under formal investigation



Dr Jacob Breslow, one of its trustees, also stood down in October following complaints that he had spoken at the B4U-ACT conference in 2011, a group which promotes support for paedophiles and calls for them to have the right to live “in truth and dignity”. 

Mermaids also launched the first legal challenge of its kind against the LGB Alliance, a charity which is critical of “gender ideology”, seeking to strip it of its charitable status

The statutory Charity Commission probe will examine the administration, governance and management of the charity by the trustees, as well as its leadership and culture. 

It will also assess whether the trustees have complied with charity law and whether there has been “any misconduct and/or mismanagement by the trustees” and a report will be published.

A Charity Commission source said no further updates will be provided until a report is produced in due course. 

A Mermaids spokesman said: “We will continue to cooperate fully, openly and with complete transparency with the Charity Commission as its inquiry gets underway.”

Source link

Continue Reading


Mother may have to tell her young children Father Christmas because she does not money for presents



A mother-of-four fears she will have to tell her children the truth about Santa this Christmas because she does not have enough money to give them presents. 

Rachel, from Scotland, has four children under the age of ten and currently pays her bills in a ‘bill roulette’ amid the cost of living crisis, which is set to cripple Christmas this year, with millions cutting back on gifts – or not buying them at all.

In a TikTok video, the 30-year-old claims Universal Credit and says going back to work would be be too crippling financially. 

She said: ‘If I had family to help me I’d go back to work. People say I’m sitting on my backside all day, but I’ve been a working mum and now I’m a stay-at-home mum and feel like I’m doing the job of ten people.

‘At least being at work I’d be able to have a cup of tea and a sit down. I used to be a manager for Samsung when I’d had my son, who’s now eight, and worked up the ladder so I could afford nursery fees and have a living wage, but then I got pregnant with my daughter who is now five, and I had every intention of going back, as I loved my job.

‘When I started looking at nursery places and the cost of nursery and after school care for two, it was costing around £1,800 which understandably ruined my salary.

‘I could work 50 hours a week and be lucky to have £50 a month left, or I could stay at home and be the one to raise my kids rather than someone else, whilst in the same financial position.

Rachel has been inundated with messages from trolls telling her she should not have had so many children and that she spends her days ‘sitting around’.

She added: ‘People assume I don’t want to work but I would love to! No one in their right mind would work 50 hours a week for nothing.

Rachel (pictured), from Scotland, has four children under the age of ten and currently pays her bills in a ‘bill roulette’.

‘I feel trapped because my youngest is 19 months old, so he isn’t close to starting school yet.

‘We’re raising four kids on the money given to raise two kids. One is my husband’s child from a previous relationship, and one is mine from a previous relationship and then we had two together and didn’t discuss having any more as I was on the pill when I fell pregnant.

‘I then fell pregnant with my youngest whilst on the coil so it’s not like we hadn’t tried to not have any more.

‘But to be honest, it’s no one’s business about my contraception. I hate the assumption people have telling me I shouldn’t have popped out kids I can’t afford.

‘We’re just surviving! We play roulette with our direct debits, whoever comes to us first can have the money. Will it be the gas and electric or the car finance?

The 30-year-old claims Universal Credit and says going back to work would be be too crippling financially

The 30-year-old claims Universal Credit and says going back to work would be be too crippling financially

‘I don’t feel like we’re built to just survive and have no enjoyment, I should be able to buy my kids clothes without stressing. I’ve been sewing up the same pair of my own leggings for four years!

‘People who say they don’t understand and have never been in this position, I tell them, if I got a job, who would look after my kids? I can’t return them or leave them in the house.

‘Someone even said I should work night shifts, but what do I do with my 18-month-old? I wouldn’t survive.

‘People want to offer solutions without thinking if it’s even possible. I’ve heard every solution under the sun!’

To shave money off her shopping bill she buys clothes from charity shops, chooses sausages over chicken, does not buy as many snacks and has even sold her husband’s phone for extra money. 

She added: ‘I just want to make my kids happy. I don’t want them to feel embarrassed and as a parent you’ll do anything. I’m always thinking of ways.

‘It’s horrific leading up to Christmas, it makes me physically ill. My daughter has her birthday just before Christmas as well so I’m essentially Christmas shopping for four and birthday shopping as well which then feels like I’m shopping for five.

‘I’ve never bought my husband a gift and he hasn’t for me, not even chocolate, everything goes to the kids!

‘It can make you feel ashamed when you take something for free, it’s almost like begging and knocks your pride, but the stakes get higher and higher. We’re fighting an impossible battle.

‘What do I do when the kids get older and want more expensive clothes as their friends are wearing it?

‘If no one speaks out, nothing will change and people will feel alone.

‘I know I’m not the only one in this situation, and I know there are people who are in worse positions, but I wouldn’t wish this on my worst enemy.

‘Other opinions don’t matter to me but when people think I’m lazy and don’t work hard, it’s not fair. I wish I could work.

‘If people lived my life, I’d love them to tell me where you can fit a job in?’

Source link

Continue Reading